Friday, 8 April 2016

Rate Making - Part 1 - Anti Selection, Rate Relativity, and Credibility

WHY IS THERE A NEED FOR RATE RELATIVES?
1. Individual Insureds differ in potential risk and amount of insurance coverage.

2. We can ensure each group pays its share of losses and avoid anti-selection while ensuring fair discrimination.


ANTI-SELECTION
1. A situation where sellers have information that buyers do not, or vice versa, about some aspect of product quality. In the case of insurance, adverse selection is the tendency of those in dangerous jobs or high-risk lifestyles to get life insurance.

2. To fight adverse selection, insurance companies try to reduce exposure to large claims by limiting coverage or raising premiums.


OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN RATING DISTINCTIONS
Operational
Social
Legal
Actuarial
·      Clear objective definition of which demographic is in group
·      Administrative expense

·       Privacy
·       Causality
·       Affordability

·     Constitutional
·     Statutory
·     Regulatory

·       Homogeneity
·       Reliability
·       Credibility





BASIC METHOD FOR RATE RELATIVITY
1. Loss ratio relativity method - Produces  changes in relativity.
Class
Premium $
Losses $
Loss Ratio
Loss Ratio Relativity
Current Relativity
New Relativity
1
1000000
600000
0.60
1.00
1
1
2
3000000
700000
0.23
0.39
1.17
0.45

2. Pure premium relativity method - Produces indicated relativity.
Class
Exposures
Losses $
Pure Premium
Pure Premium Relativity
1
6,000
900,000
150
1
2
7,000
1,300,000
186
1.24


CREDIBILITY
1. Weightage assigned to a given body of data

2. Designated by Z. Below are common properties.

3.  0 < Z < 1  (data is given full weight and fully credible at Z = 1)

4. Diff Z/ Diff E > 0 (credibility increases as experience increases)

5. Diff (Z/E) / Diff E <0 (Percentage change in credibility decrease as volume of experience increases)


ESTIMATING CREDIBILITY
1. Bayesian 

Z = E/ (E+K)

Note: E = Exposure, K = expected variance within classes or variance between classes

2. Classical or Limited Fluctuation   

Z = (n/k)^0.5

Note: n = observed number of claims, k = full credibility standard


EXAMPLE OF APPLYING  CREDIBILITY
1. Calculating new relativity from loss ratio
Class
Loss Ratio
Credibility (Z)
Credibility Weighted Loss Ratio (LR)
Loss Ratio Relativity
Current Relativity
New Relativity
1
0.7
0.6
0.66
1
1
1
2
0.4
0.8
0.44
0.67
2
1.33
Total LR
0.6

Note: Credibility weighted Loss Ratio is calculated as follow:
LR= (Z)LRclass i + (1-Z) LRstate 

2. Off-Balance Adjustment
Class
Premium
Current Relativity
Premium @ Base Class Rates
Proposed Relativity
Proposed Premium
1
2,000,000
1
2,000,000
1
                          2,000,000
2
3,000,000
2
1,500,000
1.33
                          1,995,000
Total
5,000,000



3,995,000